national geographic documentary, I read this book since I was occupied with the Olmecs in Central American, who were the heralds of the Maya and Aztec. There is confirmation that this tribe, truth be told, had the logbook of the Long Count before the Mayans, yet there is no proof that both of these people groups were sufficiently modern to have created this date-book with the specialized learning required. This schedule predicts the world to end in 2012 is, clearly, accepting a lot of consideration today. I expect we will get nearer to reality of the message, which is likely not foreseeing the apocalypse.
national geographic documentary, One a player in this learning, as I'm starting to comprehend it, is the precession of the equinoxes. This alludes to the moderate development of the groups of stars in the sky in reference to perceptions from earth. Our researchers did not have this data until later in the 1900s. How did the Olmecs, living around 1500 BCE, can watch the skies over such a long stretch to comprehend this about 26,000 cycle? This answer is one of the creator's reasons that a more propelled progress existed on earth before our recorded ones.
national geographic documentary, What's more, there is no record of any correspondence or contact between such human advancements as the Egyptians and Olmecs or prior ones in Peru. However each had the same data, as displayed in their comparable pyramids. No pyramids of similar quality have been worked subsequent to. What is the possibility of that happening unless there would some say some was gathering that had contact with both? Also, who might that gathering be? There is no such confirmation accessible in our written history, aside from in the suggestive references to old Quetzalcoatl and comparable tall, outsiders in different parts of Central and South America. In Egypt, the obscure could be Osiris who comes to us in myth. Comparative stories happen in numerous different societies, however none that appear to clear up.
Hancock trusts this obscure progress could be identified with Atlantis, and he recommends that the riddle of this landmass could be Antarctica. There is a reason that the precession examined above correlates with the onset and end of the ice age, which could clarify how this development was lost under the ice of Antarctica. There are three synchronous events that may have made this happen: the earth in its uttermost point far from the sun, the world's pivot of north and south shafts more vertical than typical, and the precession of the equinoxes. Once more, Hancock displays some persuading research.
No comments:
Post a Comment